Sage Blogger: ReviewMe Is Behind On Blog Statistics
AndyBeard
· 2 years ago
I have been told that they are going to be updated on the first of the month, though that was on the last day of January, and they didn't specify which month.
Hang in there
Besides that fact, you might want to compare your stats with those on the pricing tier above you to see if it will make a difference.
Advertisers I am sure are aware of the lag in stats, thus they will take a look at the sites. If I was paying for links, I would not only look at current, but growth trends.
I have only done one review, I declined a second one (well it expired before I made up my mind about it) - The most important factor is they pay on time.
Vlad
· 2 years ago
Thanks Andy,
I am not that worried about the price. Currently I am at the lowest end, I believe at $60 per review.
I think they could have done a better job keeping up with the statistics. Besides I do not understand how do they figure out the average number of "subscribers"?
I am glad it is working for you. I will definetely hang in there. $60 is better than nothing right?
Thanks for stopping by!
AndyBeard
· 2 years ago
For subscribers I am not sure if they use Feedburner or just bloglines data.
Of $60 you only receive half
Just think, I am still rated the same as you, with ~300 subscribers and Alexa / Technorati both around 20k (though 3 month Alexa is 38k
Vlad
· 2 years ago
Andy, That was exactly my point when I wrote: >>What about bloggers who through hard work were able to to achieve wonderful rankings?<<
I think it is unfair that your blog is getting priced at $60 with so many more feed subsribers and that much better technorati rank.
Ken Y-N
· 2 years ago
Funnily enough, I ended up here after spotting your blog as one of the featured ones on ReviewMe then checking your RSS feed.
Interesting about your two ratings - I just signed up with the service last night, and I am on $100 per review with Alexa around 300,000 or more, Technorati (when it works) of 25,000, and just over 400 RSS readers (higher than average given my traffic?) according to FeedBurner.
Whether or not anyone will pay that is a different matter altogether...
Vlad
· 2 years ago
Ken Welcome!
Believe it or not I just got the first review request today afer I posted this article.
All Comments
Hang in there
Besides that fact, you might want to compare your stats with those on the pricing tier above you to see if it will make a difference.
Advertisers I am sure are aware of the lag in stats, thus they will take a look at the sites.
If I was paying for links, I would not only look at current, but growth trends.
I have only done one review, I declined a second one (well it expired before I made up my mind about it) - The most important factor is they pay on time.
I am not that worried about the price. Currently I am at the lowest end, I believe at $60 per review.
I think they could have done a better job keeping up with the statistics. Besides I do not understand how do they figure out the average number of "subscribers"?
I am glad it is working for you. I will definetely hang in there. $60 is better than nothing right?
Thanks for stopping by!
Of $60 you only receive half
Just think, I am still rated the same as you, with ~300 subscribers and Alexa / Technorati both around 20k (though 3 month Alexa is 38k
That was exactly my point when I wrote:
>>What about bloggers who through hard work were able to to achieve wonderful rankings?<<
I think it is unfair that your blog is getting priced at $60 with so many more feed subsribers and that much better technorati rank.
Interesting about your two ratings - I just signed up with the service last night, and I am on $100 per review with Alexa around 300,000 or more, Technorati (when it works) of 25,000, and just over 400 RSS readers (higher than average given my traffic?) according to FeedBurner.
Whether or not anyone will pay that is a different matter altogether...
Believe it or not I just got the first review request today afer I posted this article.