<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Sage Blogger - Latest Comments in No More Video Blogging?</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/</link><description>Affiliate Marketing, Blogging and other fun stuff</description><atom:link href="https://sageblogger.disqus.com/no_more_video_blogging/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:58:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No More Video Blogging?</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/no-more-video-blogging/#comment-1793705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think I will be getting two cameras at this point one might just be Flip for quick vlogging, I am however in the middle of a project that would rather have some what better quality of the footage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hard disk camcorders come short of what I need. I am sure that the future of the digital video is not MiniDV but so far these camcorders are capable to produce the best quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No More Video Blogging?</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/no-more-video-blogging/#comment-1793704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vlad, you should just use whatever picture camera is lying around. I've been doing that all along, and it works fine...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CT Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No More Video Blogging?</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/no-more-video-blogging/#comment-1793703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mark,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On one hand I really do not need that much- after all there is limit with what we can do with web videos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I believe we will see great improvement over the period of next few months and if you look at most of the higher end camcorders they all are MiniDV type.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The down side with MiniDV is the capture process, but I think I can deal with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No More Video Blogging?</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/no-more-video-blogging/#comment-1793702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;vlad - bummer on your camera&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I took the plunge a few weeks ago and purchased a digital video camera&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;panasonic SDR-H18&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it isn't perfect (it takes a second or two to turn on and the color has trouble adjusting a few times) but has been working fine for me and the quality is the same as my digital camera (except now I can record longer than 7 minutes, lol).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;remember for 4-500 dollars you are just getting an entry level hard drive camera so don't expect hollywood quality&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;mark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">45n5</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>