<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Sage Blogger - Latest Comments in Could Hairspray Have Been Better Without Travolta?</title><link>http://sageblogger.disqus.com/</link><description>Affiliate Marketing, Blogging and other fun stuff</description><atom:link href="https://sageblogger.disqus.com/could_hairspray_have_been_better_without_travolta/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:19:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Could Hairspray Have Been Better Without Travolta?</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/could-hairspray-have-been-better-without-travolta/#comment-1793368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea why Hollywood is so in love with remaking movies that don't need to be remade. No wait, I do. They're out of ideas and afraid to take risks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hairspray (the original) is a classic. They did Texas Chainsaw, why not do The Exorcist next (one of the greatest movies ever made, horror or otherwise).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Waiting for remakes of Citizen Kane, Star Wars, and Rocky Horror next.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Lankton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>