Sage Blogger - Latest Comments in Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Vlad — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:46:23 -0000

Gary,

I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.

For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.

Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Gary — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:30:50 -0000

Vlad,

Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Vlad — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:25:01 -0000

If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Vlad — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:33:34 -0000

"that exact copy of an article goes all the directories"

What I wanted to say is:

that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Vlad — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:16:05 -0000

I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.

I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.

I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results.... Now that I am back in Google ;)

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Andy Beard — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:07:14 -0000

This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don't want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.

I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.

The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Vlad — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:43:22 -0000

Matt,

I am actually impressed with the end results. I am just waiting to see how the publishing to all the networks will work.

I will post here a link as soon as article goes live. Thanks for the stumble.

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

list building — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:45:58 -0000

Thanks for running a live experiment on CSN. I was just looking at this service about three days ago and I was considering joining. But it is great that you are running some quick tests to see if CSN is worth investing.

I can't wait to hear your results. I will try to frequently read your updates to see what type of results you are getting. I have been a fan of article marketing in the past..but it is just too time consuming. Hopefully, CSN will be the solution to this time issue.

Re: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial

Matt Keegan — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:59:04 -0000

CSN could work for writers struggling with producing compelling copy, but I'd be interested in reading how that final copy reads.

Some of the rewritten stuff I have found around the internet is dull and unconvincing as the writer's lack of subject knowledge (or care to write properly) is evident.

Hopefully, you'll find CSN to work otherwise -- best wishes for a successful test run.