9 comments

• 

  Matt Keegan

  1 year ago

  CSN could work for writers struggling with producing compelling copy, but I'd be interested in reading how that final copy reads.
  
  Some of the rewritten stuff I have found around the internet is dull and unconvincing as the writer's lack of subject knowledge (or care to write properly) is evident.
  
  Hopefully, you'll find CSN to work otherwise -- best wishes for a successful test run.
  reply
• 

  list building

  1 year ago

  Thanks for running a live experiment on CSN. I was just looking at this service about three days ago and I was considering joining. But it is great that you are running some quick tests to see if CSN is worth investing.
  
  I can't wait to hear your results. I will try to frequently read your updates to see what type of results you are getting. I have been a fan of article marketing in the past..but it is just too time consuming. Hopefully, CSN will be the solution to this time issue.
  reply
• 

  Vlad

  1 year ago

  Matt,
  
  I am actually impressed with the end results. I am just waiting to see how the publishing to all the networks will work.
  
  I will post here a link as soon as article goes live. Thanks for the stumble.
  reply
• 

  Andy Beard

  1 year ago

  This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don't want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.
  
  I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.
  
  The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.
  reply
• 

  Vlad

  1 year ago

  I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.
  
  I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.
  
  I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results.... Now that I am back in Google ;)
  reply
• 

  Vlad

  1 year ago

  "that exact copy of an article goes all the directories"
  
  What I wanted to say is:
  
  that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories
  reply
• 

  Vlad

  1 year ago

  If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.
  reply
• 

  Gary

  1 year ago

  Vlad,
  
  Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?
  reply
• 

  Vlad

  1 year ago

  Gary,
  
  I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.
  
  For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.
  
  Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.
  reply