-
Website
http://sageblogger.com/ -
Original page
http://sageblogger.com/bumpzee-follow-nofollow-and-what-you-can-do-about-it/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
The only solution would be to block all your content with robot.txt, or even the whole site - that is just not a sensible solution.
Having you content will help to have your site indexed more frequently. Aaron Wall has written that caching frequency is a good indication of trust from the search engines. The more you can encourage search engines to visit, the better.
-------
Mark, you welcome.
Encouraging Google to spider your site more frequently should be a high priority, and for Google to know the original source for an article, the link has to be followed.
That is how they work now, who knows in the future.
The Title of the Detail Page has your post title in it, yeah, but no link with the keywords in the anchor point to it.
Accept the Link Love from Bumpzee, send Scott a nice thank you email and get over it :).
Creating a duplicate copy of your articles title on a more authoritative domain is supposed to help your SEO? Give me a break. I've already shown that bumpzee will outrank me. That isn't debatable.
Isn't the point of "SEO" to rank the highest?
"Encouraging Google to spider your site more frequently should be a high priority", at the cost of having the encouraging site rank higher? No thanks.
Oh and a ps. the Squidoo lenses are nearer the top because they were newly discovered a bit later than other sites.
Reviewweb seems to have dropped down quite a few places, I expect that to happen with the articles and Squidoo soon as well.
If you really think syndication is a bad thing, make sure you never ping your blog anywhere.
Bumpzee is much better to "ping" than Technorati, because that link they give back guarantees that long term you will be looked on as the original source.
It is very similar with article marketing - when you first publish your article, sites like EzineArticles.com might out-rank you, but long-term if you include a link in your foot back to the original artcle (not to your root domain), you will out-rank the article sites.
As a real example, search in Google for Lifelong Customers - I rank about 5th, and then there are a stream of article sites with the same article.
A lot depends on your site structure of course.
45n5: Bumpzee will outrank you for a search for your post title, if you have a new site in Google's Sandbox. That should change once Google counts your site 100% without any "penalties".
Your post title is hopefully backed up by the post content. If your Title is unrelated and the only place where you have your keywords on the page, yeah, Bumpzee will outrank you among a lot of other sites. Pretty much everybody with content relevant to the Keywords. Pretty much.
They are at the top! That is my point!
With hype products you want to rank TODAY for the term, hence go write at squidoo.
And the difference between pinging weblogs.com and bumpzee is, bumpzee takes your post title and potentially adds many comments (or content) behind that title, they aren't simply an aggregator only.
Google search for
"Lifelong Customers for Sharing Your Knowledge"
That is the full article headline
2 weeks ago that same article on my site appeared 5th. (I included a screenshot in a blog post 23rd Jan)
I didn't help Google out very much because the resource box didn't have a link back to my original article.
Now lets look at a much more recent article / post combination.
"Articles Are Seeds of Knowledge - A Biblical Look at Duplicate Content"
I now have a lot more links and trust, and I linked back to the original blog post. The article is almost immediately allocated to me.
I honestly wouldn't use nofollow at Bumpzee - it is helping you.
Only yesterday a new site splogged 10 of my full posts. The link back to me in the title was to my Feedburner feed, but there were links all through the content, and in the footer to the original URL. The splogger was also using trackback.
He has a perfect right to use my content, that is the way I license it. All I did was block his site from trackbacks because it was over doing things a little.
Being the number one lens in shopping helps with all kinds additional links on Squidoo so the site doesn't get buried.
Being at the top first (like day job killer) sure does help your chances of getting those backlinks ;-)
Sounds good to me, I think the other way. The beauty of it is there is the option for you to have it your way and me to have it mine.
Carsten, thanks for stopping by. Just clarify, I am happy and thankful that Bumpzee is sending my way some visitors.
Mark, thanks for keeping up this dicussion!
Andy, as always, great to hear your insights!
Serolloah, thanks for stopping by.
And i still conclude "The beauty of it is there is the option for you to have it your way and me to have it mine." which was the point of your post...
http://www.billhartzer.com/pages/timing-of-link...
The only yardstick I am comparing to on the Day Job Killer results is Andre Chaperon, because he has an aged PR6, compared to my very young domain with PR5. We both had pages up within a few hours of each other on 30th January.
Also don't forget the long tail, which actually brought in as much traffic for me as specific search.
I am glad you have brought up the long tail. I don't believe that every one realizes that long tail is resposabile for 90%(this site) of all search traffic. I have just started to pay closer attention to long tail and can tell you that some of my articles come up on the first pages of the search engines for keywords that are not in the title. It is rare and they do not keep the position for long but provide some good insights.
For the bigger sites I imagine long tail is resposible for 99.9% for natural search traffic.
I think "nofollow" topic surfaced again and became hot after Wikipedia's change. While intially did not welcome Wikipedia's move, I think I am changing my mind now.
When it comes to sites like Digg, Plugim and other similar ones, move to "nofollow" my prove to be devastating, imho. While these sites have alot of fresh content, much of that content is submited with hope to be dugged, plugged, bumped to the front page but also with hope to get a link to your site. At least it is my intention.
Unfortunately there are many articles on these social sites that were dugged and plugged and even commented on by users who did not even bother to read the source, and alot of that is happening there. But who cares I got link from them right? The moment Digg or others introduces "nofollow" I am dropping their plugin buttons and anything other link poiting to their site because in my eyes they would loose any credibility.
BUT! If they followed Scott's example and implemented option for users to chose whethere or not to use "nofollow" maybe it will calm some diggers down over "blog submitions".
agreed. Now if I can just get everybody to agree with all my opinions there, lol ;-) Just kidding, I learn also.
Thanks for the link andy.
But then I guess any traffic is better than no traffic, right?
Thanks for stopping by. I think one of the things that turned me off from Digg, besides being banned, was the ignorance of some of the members. At BumpZee if no one likes your posts you simply do no receive "bumps".
Wonder what happen if we all use nofollow on our websites? And how about DMOZ & Yahoo directory.
Have a good one.